Sunday, 19 September 2010
-
How lose weight fast
Bad news for dieters who just can’t seem to lose the weight on their own, the Food and Drug Administration's advisory committee has voted no to a new obesity drug, lorcaserin.
The drug got a thumbs down in a 9 to 5 vote because the FDA thought the side effects outweighed any potential benefits, according to Medicalnewstoday.com.
This is the third time in a year that an obesity drug didn’t get approval from the panel. Members of the panel were concerned about high rates of both memory loss and depression in patients who tried out the new pill, according to The Associated Press.
The pill, made by Arena Pharmaceuticals, is thought to work by stimulating a serotonin receptor in the brain; the receptor has been associated with changes in feelings of satiety and feeding behavior, according to Arena. Dr. Edward W. Gregg, a panel member, said the drug was "promising" although "not quite there yet," said WebMD.
Just this week, the same panel, the FDA Endocrinologic and Metabolic Drugs Advisory Committee, voted 8 to 8 about whether Meridia, a weight loss drug made by Abbott, should stay on the market. It was banned earlier this year by European regulators.
In the U.S., where nearly 35% of the people are obese, there would be a potentially lucrative market for a weight-loss drug. But a magic pill isn’t about to come on the market. "There is no magic bullet, no ultimately successful weight loss pill," says Vanderbilt University endocrinologist Dr. Kevin Niswender, who specializes in the treatment of obesity. "And ultimately, I don’t think that there ever will be."
In order to be effective, he says, an oral medication would need to be used in conjunction with other treatments such as nutrition and fitness counseling and with therapy to treat depression. "Medications may have a role in jump-starting weight loss but obesity is a chronic disease and you can’t stay on medicine for your life," Niswender said.
Bariatric surgery is not an option for the majority of peop"le. There is currently no effective obesity drug on the market," said Dr. Walter Pories, professor of surgery at East Carolina University in Greenville, N.C. "And only 0.4% of the American public has access to bariatric surgery."
When and if a medication to lose weight hits the market, it’s still not going to be a panacea.
"Everything has side effects," Niswender says. "And when a person stops taking a drug, the weight goes up."
Wednesday, 24 March 2010
-
Cigarettes may affect your finances
Smoking does more than hurt your health; it does a number on your wallet, as well.
A pack of cigarettes now costs more than $5 on average—with some states tacking on additional taxes that raise the price even more.
In New York City, local taxes have pushed the cost of a pack to about $10.
Even if you don't smoke yourself, cigarettes may affect your finances: Between 1997 and 2001, smoking was responsible for $167 billion in annual health-care costs and lost productivity in the U.S. alone.
Sure, quitting can also be costly, depending on which route you take.
But once you kick your daily habit, you will likely find your bank account is healthier too.
Cutting out cigarettes—whether you light up once or more than a dozen times a day—can save you hundreds, if not thousands, of dollars each year.When Kirk Danby decided to quit smoking, he made a list of the benefits he'd gain—starting with the $3,650 he would save per year. "Multiply that by 20 years, and I realized that I have smoked enough to have put a decent down payment on a house," says Danby, 38, of Tokyo, Japan.
"Shock and horror sets in."Use the information below to determine your own spending habits. Knowing exactly how much you've been draining your bank account may be the motivation you need to quit.
Stop smoke
Zero Nicotine is an innovative stop smoking patch designed to help you give up smoking safely and naturally.
Smoking Everywhere Electronic Cigarette is a new product beneficial for both regular smokers and those willing to quit, and also those who don't want to be exposed to somebody else's cigarette smoke or inadvertently harm non-smokers around.
Thursday, 04 March 2010
-
The pregnancy prevention.Surveyed American singles
According to a new study by the National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy, many young American men exhibit attitudes toward contraception that could best be described as “magical.” The study [PDF] surveyed American singles ages 18–29 about their perceptions about and use of contraception. Twenty-eight percent of young men think that wearing two condoms at a time is more effective than just one. Twenty-five percent think that women can prevent pregnancy by douching after sex. Eighteen percent believe that they can reduce the chance of pregnancy by doing it standing up.
For the most part, men lagged behind women on the pregnancy prevention front. And when the study dipped into the realm of “female” forms of birth control, the gender divide intensified. In the study, 29 percent of men and 32 percent of women reported that they know “little or nothing about condoms.” When asked to rate their knowledge of birth control pills, 78 percent of men reported to be clueless, compared to 45 percent of women.
In addition to staging teach-ins, women are also responsible for shouldering the physical, emotional, and financial responsibilities for pregnancy prevention. Pap smears, STI tests, and gynecological sessions about their contraceptive options—that’s just the tip of it for the sexually active woman. In order to keep their birth control subscription fresh, they have to repeat that process every year. Their male sex partners are under no such requirements. As Salon noted last year, women have 11 methods of contraception from which to choose; men have two—condom and vasectomy. And even if men did have additional reliable birth control options, many women wouldn’t trust them to use them correctly. In a comment on the Salon article, one woman wrote, “I love my husband more than anything in the world but I would not place that responsibility on him because if the BC failed and he was responsible for it I would kill him then he would be dead and I would be having a child while in prison.” Perhaps it is no mystery why some men confine their responsibility to forms of birth control which relate directly to their own genitalia.
Gustav Seestedt, 23, says that birth control pills are the form of contraception he has “the most indirect experience with.” He has no idea how they work. “I thought it, uh, controlled, uh… I actually don’t know, now that I think about it,” he says. “Oh, man, I thought it had something to do with hormonal control, but that doesn’t seem right at all. That sounds pretty awful. I thought it, uh, somehow killed fertility with like chemicals and stuff,” he says. The ring, however, strikes Seestedt as a superior option. “I thought that was pretty fine, because, from what I understood, it was kind of a low-cost way of doing it, and it wasn’t really…I like it because chemical pills and stuff are kind of weird, [but the ring] was kind of placed inside, and…you know what I mean? It just kind of did its thing, you know?”
To some, the male indifference to birth control can be attributed to a juvenile disregard for all things related to the place in which the vaginal ring “does its thing.” We live in a country where heterosexual heartthrob Robert Pattinson feels comfortable announcing to Details magazine, “I really hate vaginas. I’m allergic to vagina.” Where tech nerds everywhere let out a collective titter over new Apple device the “iPad,” because it sounds kind of like a thing women use when they’re on their periods. Where Judd Apatow has built a film career out of turning extended vagina jokes into blockbusters.
Saturday, 27 February 2010
-
African-Americans
African-Americans age 65 and younger are more than twice as likely to have a stroke compared with Caucasians in any region, and people who have a stroke are more likely to die in the South than elsewhere, according to researchers at the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) School of Public Health.
The findings are from UAB's Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study, one of the largest ongoing health studies that includes more than 30,200 U.S. participants.
This new report is among the first to show major regional and racial disparities in stroke rates. It also underscores the need for targeted stroke-prevention and care strategies in those at greatest risk, said Virginia Howard, Ph.D., a UAB associate professor of epidemiology and a REGARDS co-principal investigator.
The study was presented Feb. 26 at the International Stroke Conference in San Antonio.
"This is the first study to take national data and really lay it out on the table," Howard said. "We found in the 45-54 age group that blacks have a 2.5-fold greater stroke rate compared to whites, which is startling."
The study also shows a stroke rate greater than 12 percent higher in eight Southeast states known as the Stroke Belt - Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, North and South Carolina and Tennessee - with the highest stroke rate in the coastal states of Georgia, North and South Carolina.
"These are stroke-incidence data. It doesn't tell us how to fix the problem, but it gives us our clearest stroke picture to date in this country," Howard said.
In the new study, REGARDS researchers reviewed data on more than 26,500 participants with no history of stroke. They kept in periodic telephone contact with the participants for nearly five years and documented 299 strokes to which they applied a rate formula. In the 45-54 age group, the stroke rate is 192 percent for African-Americans compared with 74 percent for whites.
"That disparity in the incidence rate evens out and changes as you monitor stroke in older Americans. In fact the racial differences reverse, so by the time they reach about age 80 and older, whites have a higher stroke rate compared with blacks," Howard said. It is not clear why the differences change with age, but it may have to do with different types of strokes occurring in different age groups.
The bottom line is that certain subgroups are at greater risk and need to pay closer attention to their stroke-risk factors, said George Howard, Dr.PH., a UAB professor of biostatistics and a REGARDS co-principal investigator. Stroke-risk factors include family history, high blood pressure and high cholesterol, diabetes, obesity, tobacco use and other variables.
The new study was collaboration between UAB, the University of Cincinnati, the University of Vermont in Burlington, Wake Forest University in Winston-Salem, N.C. and the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS). Funding for this study comes from NINDS.


